Star trek future films
By Gabe Toro comments Ask any screenwriter and director currently involved in a young franchise and they'll say the same thing. We haven't met the characters yet. We haven't established the universe. Baby steps, etc. It gets a little frustrating because for once you'd like to see one movie without being pressured into seeing another. The new Star Trek seems pretty well-developed, however, so it's a little unusual to see Star Trek 3 director Roberto Orci reveal that there's much to learn about this crew's final frontier. During a podcast with Humans From Earth, Roberto Orci claims that for the next entry in the Star Trek saga, they'll be going where no man has gone before (spoiler: space). In [ Into Darkness] they set out finally where the original series started. The first two films especially the 2009 [ Star Trek] was an origin story. It was about them coming together. So they werent the characters they were in the original series. They were growing into them and that continues on in the second movie. So in this movie they are closer than they are to the original series characters that you have ever seen. They have set off on their five-year mission. So their adventure is going to be in deep space. It's hard to underestimate the disappointment in diehards familiar with the series when they saw the first trailers for Star Trek Into Darkness. What was this business about the Enterprise crashing into skyscrapers? What was this cityscape business? Where's the space we were promised after Star Trek? Benedict Cumberbatch doesn't look like any alien I know! It continued during the film, where locating Cumberbatch's John Harrison (whatever) meant starting some sort of intergalactic war, the sort of intergalactic war that just fades away and is never discussed again. The original crew of the Enterprise was meant to embark upon a five year mission into.
Real World article(written from a Production point of view) Warning! This page contains information regarding the upcoming film, and thus may contain spoilers. Memory Alpha contains spoilers to released material only. No information about this film can be added until Paramount or an identified studio source discuss information with a press outlet, such as a news service. Because Memory Alpha does not want to include unconfirmed data, please use the talk page to suggest or explain an addition to this article, only if it has a citation that could be referenced here. Star Trek Beyond is an announced film sequel to the 2013 film Star Trek Into Darkness. It is due to be released by Paramount Pictures on After originally being scheduled for release on, [1] the date was pushed out two weeks on 17 September 2015. [2] The working title for this sequel was Washington and Washington Project. [3] [4] [5] On, Trek Movie.com announced that Star Trek Beyond may be the title of the film. [6] The title was later confirmed by Director Justin Lin. [7] Story Edit Justin Lin has said that, with the characters on the five-year mission, It's all new and fresh. The Klingons, Romulans and other species are great, but it's time to go further. It has been fun to focus on creating whole new worlds and species. [8] In the film, Idris Elba will play a villain. [9] J. J. Abrams has stated he would like more female characters in the sequel. [10] He also mentioned the sequel could fall back on abandoned story ideas for the characters. There was [an idea] implying the sexuality of one of the characters, a back story for another character that was pretty intense, a really funny story we wanted to do with yet another. Hopefully, if there are future films, those other stories will get their moment, he said. [11] Roberto Orci has voiced support for having a gay.
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | of 203 items from 2016 « Prev | Next » Star Trek Beyond Deconstructs the Entire Franchise 16 hours ago | Movie Web | See recent Movie Web news » This year marks the 50th Anniversary of the original Star Trek TV show, along with the release of Paramount's third film in their reboot series, Star Trek Beyond. It was established at the end of 2013's Star Trek Into Darkness that the USS Enterprise crew was starting their famed five-year mission, but some fans were left with a bad taste in their mouth. Many thought the sequel was too similar to the second original Star Trek movie, 1982's The Wrath of Khan. Director Justin Lin, who takes over for J. J. Abrams, says in a new interview that he really wanted to deconstruct the whole franchise, to honor its 50th Anniversary. This is the 50th anniversary. I felt like it was important to really deconstruct the idea of Star Trek, the idea of the Federation and why it's special. We'll really be poking at a lot of different things. Along with » - Movie Web See full article at Movie Web » Permalink | Report a problem Simon Pegg Says ' Star Trek Beyond' Will ' Deconstruct the Idea of Star Trek' 22 hours ago | Latino Review | See recent Latino Review news » Star Trek is a franchise that ironically seems to be in a bit of trouble. Most audiences adored the 2009 J. J. Abrams-directed reboot, but for some reason, a good number of those fans disliked its sequel, Star Trek Into Darkness. While yes, the film itself wasn’t as great as its predecessor, it doesn’t really deserve to be seen as the film that set the franchise back. Perhaps the perceived failure of that film was two-fold. First is the fact that it wasn’t as good as the first one — a fact that few fans let go of. Second is the fact this rebooted series as a whole wasn’t too much in the spirit of the Star Trek franchise to begin with. So not only did the.
Star Trek Into Darkness is a hit movie — it's just not enough of a hit for Paramount. What does this mean for the future of Trek? In its second weekend, Star Trek Into Darkness dropped a vertiginous 46.9 percent, a bigger fall-off than the first J. J. Abrams Trek movie in 2009. Most box office experts now expect the second rebooted Trek film to fall short of the 5 million that Trek09 made domestically. And yes, STID is performing better overseas, thanks to a huge campaign, but not enough — and studios still care about domestic gross a lot, for reasons that are too complicated to go into here. Like the first Star Trek, this was a fantastically expensive film, with a budget estimated around 0 million plus mammoth promotional expenses. Star Trek Into Darkness will definitely wind up making a profit, especially when you factor in DVD and VOD and so on, but it's not the megahit Paramount wanted. Let's just restate the above before we go any further: we're talking about a successful movie, that will probably make a profit. The thing is, 2009's Star Trek was moderately successful, given how expensive it was, and Paramount was probably hoping that Into Darkness would be the Dark Knight to Trek09's Batman Begins, as Forbes' Scott Mendelson explains here. In other words, the first movie did pretty well, but they were hoping it would set the stage for the second film to be a huge monster hit, not just another okay performer. And worse news? Star Trek Into Darkness did worse among young movie-goers than the first movie, as The Wrap explains: Only 25 percent of those who went to see Into Darkness were under 25 years of age. That's considerably less than the 35 percent that the previous film attracted, and it's far more older-skewing than the first-weekend audiences for Disney's Iron Man 3, which was 45 percent under 25, 27 percent families and 21 percent teens. That makes it.
Production Notes from IMDb Pro Status: Filming | See complete list of in-production titles » Updated: More Info: See more production information about this title on IMDb Pro. Learn more Edit Details Release Date: ( USA) See more » Also Known As: Star Trek 3 See more » Filming Locations: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada See more » Company Credits Show detailed company contact information on IMDb Pro » Technical Specs Aspect Ratio: 2.35 : 1 See full technical specs » Edit Did You Know? Contribute to This Page.
RUMOR: Joe Cornish being considerd as director for Trek 3 November 3, 2013 by Matt Wright, Filed under: Rumor, ST: Into Darkness Sequel, 1 comment so far According to Deadline.com, Joe Cornish ( Attack the Block, The Adventures of Tin Tin) is strongly being considered for the director’s chair of the next Star Trek movie: Cornish followed by being one of the writers on The Adventures Of Tin Tin, and he and Edgar Wright wrote the script for Ant- Man, the Marvel Studios film that Wright is going to direct. Long story short, he’s gotten exposure to bigger scale projects than Attack The Block, in which he admirably depicted a full scale alien invasion on a relatively small budget. Doing a movie like this would certainly put his career on a warp speed path. He’s already working with Paramount on the novel adaptation Snow Crash which he’s prepping to present to the studio. – Deadline.com J. J. Abrams endorses Rupert Wyatt for Star Trek 3 director – still nothing official September 12, 2013 by Matt Wright, Filed under: Rumor, ST: Into Darkness Sequel, comments closed While still nothing official has been announced about the next director for the 3rd Bad Robot Star Trek movie, the website Hit Fix caught up with J. J. Abrams during the home video release celebration of Into Darkness. They asked him about the rumor that Rupert Wyatt ( Rise of the Planet of the Apes) was being considered, and the status of any pre-production progress on the 3rd movie. (more ) JJ Trek 3 possible director and writers August 6, 2013 by Matt Wright, Filed under: Rumor, ST: Into Darkness Sequel, comments closed With Star Trek Into Darkness almost on home video, what’s happening with the third Star Trek theatrical release from the new “ JJ ‘verse” timeline is foremost on Trek fans minds. There are multiples sources that say Paramount has a contender for the director’s seat, while J. J. Abrams will produce.